Comentarios a la sentencia del Tribunal Constitucional peruano que prohíbe la distribución de la denominada Anticoncepción Oral de Emergencia

Authors

  • Paolo Tejada Pinto

Keywords:

emergency oral contraception, day after pill, abortion, right to life

Abstract

Through ruling dating October 16th, 2009 which resolved the injunction interposed by a NGO the Peruvian Constitutional Tribunal prohibited the Ministry of Health from distributing the day after pill also known as Emergency Oral Contraception (EOC) for free. Claiming the pertinence of principles which are applicable in constitutional protection and which are based on the existence of reasonable doubt regarding the effects of the EOC, a majority of Magistrates pointed out that the distribution of this drug could be abortive and therefore its free distribution is unconstitutional. Naturally the Ruling has been subject to many commentaries, both favourable as well as not favourable. The present article analyzed the controversial issues and the way in which they were approached by the Tribunal.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biography

Paolo Tejada Pinto

Licenciado en Derecho por la Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú y Doctor en Teología Moral por la Universidad de Navarra. Profesor de Derecho Natural, Teoría del Derecho y Ética de la Facultad de Derecho de la Universidad de Piura.

Published

02/01/2020

How to Cite

Tejada Pinto, P. (2020). Comentarios a la sentencia del Tribunal Constitucional peruano que prohíbe la distribución de la denominada Anticoncepción Oral de Emergencia. Revista De Derecho, 11(1), 515–523. Retrieved from https://revistas.udep.edu.pe/derecho/article/view/2066

Issue

Section

COMENTARIO DE JURISPRUDENCIA