Problemática en la ejecución de sentencias de la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos. El caso peruano

Authors

  • Susana Ynes Castañeda Otsu

Keywords:

American Convention on Human Rights Inter-American Court of Human Rights, judgments and resolutions of supervision of judgment compliance, reparations, difficulties in judgment enforcement

Abstract

Peru has been the object of 28 judgments of conviction by the Inter-American Court
of Human Rights, what makes it the member country with the largest number of these
sentences. To date, it has complied with complete reparations in only two cases. The
author analyses the type of reparations ordered in the sentences, and the causes of the
high level of non-compliance. Finally, she makes offers of modification to the specific
regulation on the matter, unification of the jurisprudence on the part of the Penal
Rooms of the Supreme Court, between others, to solve partly detected problematic,
although the Peruvian State has the obligation to comply with the Court judgments
on having had accepted his contentious jurisdiction.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biography

Susana Ynes Castañeda Otsu

Presidenta de la Sala Penal de Apelaciones de Lima. Magíster en Derecho. Mención en Ciencias
Penales y Especialista en Derechos Humanos. Profesora de la Academia de la Magistratura y de
la Maestría en Derecho, Universidades San Martín de Porres, Pontificia Universidad Católica y
Nacional Mayor de San Marcos.

Published

30/11/2019

How to Cite

Castañeda Otsu, S. Y. (2019). Problemática en la ejecución de sentencias de la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos. El caso peruano. Revista De Derecho, 15(1), 11–38. Retrieved from https://revistas.udep.edu.pe/derecho/article/view/1579

Issue

Section

DOCTRINA NACIONAL