From Democratic Erosion to Autocratization: Patterns and Trends in the Twenty-First Century

Authors

  • Valter Geronimo Camilo Junior Universidad de Brasílea

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26441/RD-4086

Keywords:

Democratic erosión, autocratization, institutional resilience, political polarization

Abstract

Democratic erosion emerges as a complex global phenomenon that demands a critical analysis of its relationship with the rise of autocratic regimes. This article investigates how this democratic decline fosters autocratization, questioning whether immune democracies exist and how institutions can maintain their resilience in the face of crises. Through a qualitative literature review, contemporary patterns are analyzed, such as the backsliding in Hungary and polarization in the United States, which reveal structural vulnerabilities: institutional weakness, socioeconomic inequalities, and the instrumentalization of the political system. The study is organized into four axes: (1) the scope of erosion, demonstrating that even consolidated democracies are not exempt; (2) its historical and economic roots; (3) the turning point at which erosion becomes a deliberate autocratic project, analyzing the “qualitative leap” that transforms institutional decay into a strategy of power capture; and (4) resistance strategies, where an “architecture of democratic resilience” based on proactive civic vigilance is proposed. It is concluded that erosion arises from interrelated factors, from legacies of exclusion to current dynamics of polarization, and that autocratization represents a contingent risk, not an inevitable one, to the extent that institutional responses and citizen mobilization are effective. Thus, the article systematizes contemporary threats to democracy and articulates a model of active resilience for its sustainability.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Valter Geronimo Camilo Junior, Universidad de Brasílea

    Attorney. Master’s candidate in Law at the University of Brasília (UnB – Brazil). Bachelor of Laws from the Pontifical Catholic University of Minas Gerais (PUC-MG). This work was carried out with the support of the Academic Excellence Program (PROEX), established by the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel – Brazil (CAPES)

References

Abels, C., et al. (2024). Dodging the autocratic bullet: Enlisting behavioral science to arrest democratic backsliding. Behavioral Public Policy, pp. 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1017/bpp.2024.43 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/bpp.2024.43

Bendlin, R. W., & Witt, C. (2024). Autocratização e enfraquecimento da democracia no Brasil: 2019-2022. Interfaces Científicas-Direito, 9(3), pp. 230-246. http://doi.org/10.17564/2316-381X.2024v9n3p230-246 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17564/2316-381X.2024v9n3p230-246

Borsani, H., Vieira, S. M., & Troiano, M. (2025). Resiliência democrática na américa latina: analisando crises e superações. Lua Nova: Revista de Cultura e Política, e123038hb. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-123038hb/123 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-123038hb/123

Brito, A. S., et al. (2023). O caminho da autocracia: Estratégias atuais de erosão democrática. Tinta-da-China Brasil.

Bugarič, B. (2015). A crisis of constitutional democracy in post-Communist Europe: “Lands in-between” democracy and authoritarianism. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 13(1), pp. 219-245. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mov010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mov010

Camilo Junior, V. G. (2025). Panorama da erosão democrática no século XXI. Contribuciones a las Ciencias Sociales, 18(9), e20816. https://doi.org/10.55905/revconv.18n.9-169 DOI: https://doi.org/10.55905/revconv.18n.9-169

Croissant, A., & Lott, L. (2024). Democratic resilience in the twenty-first century: Search for an analytical framework and explorative analysis (Working Paper No. 149). Varieties of Democracy Institute, University of Gothenburg. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4932497 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4932497

Dean, J. (2024, 17 de enero). Democratic decline a global phenomenon, even in wealthy nations. Cornell Chronicle. https://news.cornell.edu/stories/2024/01/democratic-decline-global-phenomenon-even-wealthy-nations

Gargarella, R. (2022). From "democratic erosion" to "a conversation among equals." Revus, 47, pp. 1-17. https://doi.org/10.4000/revus.8079 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/revus.8079

Gaspardo, M., & Oliveira, A. R. S. M. de. (2025). Autocratização e resiliência democrática no Brasil (2019–2023). Revista Direito GV, 21, e2515. https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-6172202515 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-6172202515

Kneuer, M. (2023). Trends on Democratic Erosion: The Role Of Agency And Sequencing. International Political Science Abstracts, 73(6), pp. 837-847. https://doi.org/10.1177/00208345231218076 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00208345231218076

McCoy, J., Rahman, T., & Somer, M. (2018). Polarization and the Global Crisis of Democracy: Common Patterns, Dynamics, and Pernicious Consequences for Democratic Polities. American Behavioral Scientist, 62(1), pp. 16-42. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764218759576 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764218759576

Mussoi, H. G., & De Quadros, D. G. (2022). Erosão democrática e legalismo autocrático: o caso dos conselhos gestores no governo Bolsonaro. Rei-revista Estudos Institucionais, 8(3), pp. 582-606. https://doi.org/10.21783/rei.v8i3.680 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21783/rei.v8i3.680

Nord, M., Altman, D., Angiolillo, F., Fernandes, T., God, A. G., & Lindberg, S. I. (2025). Democracy report 2025: 25 years of autocratization – Democracy trumped? V-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5227625

Paulino, L. A. (2021). Democracias constitucionais em crise: mapeando as estratégias institucionais que levam à erosão democrática. Revista Direito, Estado e Sociedade, (58). https://doi.org/10.17808/des.58.1209 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17808/des.0.1209

Rau, E. G., & Stokes, S. (2025). Income inequality and the erosion of democracy in the twenty-first century. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 122(1), e2422543121. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2422543121 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2422543121

Roznai, Y. (2020). Who will save the redheads? Towards an anti-bully theory of judicial review and protection of democracy. William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal, 29(2), p. 327. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3488474

Somer, M., & McCoy, J. (2018). Déjà vu? Polarization and Endangered Democracies in the 21st Century. American Behavioral Scientist, 62(1), pp. 3-15. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764218760371 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764218760371

Tormey, S. (2021). Stresses and Strains: Will We Ever Agree on What’s Going Wrong with Democracy? Representation, 58(1), pp. 13-26. https://doi.org/10.1080/00344893.2021.2005674 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00344893.2021.2005674

Walz, K., Merten, L., Rosenthal, M., et al. (2025). From latest buzzword to conceptual framework: Unraveling the complexities of democratic resilience. Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft (ZfVP). Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12286-024-00618-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12286-024-00618-7

Yabanci, B., Akkoyunlu, K., & Öktem, K. (2025). Limits of autocratisation: actors and institutions of democratic resistance and opposition. Third World Quarterly, 46(2), pp. 97-116. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2025.2462248 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2025.2462248

Published

11.12.2025

Issue

Section

ARTÍCULOS

How to Cite

Camilo Junior, V. G. . (2025). From Democratic Erosion to Autocratization: Patterns and Trends in the Twenty-First Century. Revista De Derecho, 25(1), 182-207. https://doi.org/10.26441/RD-4086